Bullseye dielectric cavities for photon collection from a surface-mounted point source

These data represent the paper's numerical results with the dataset's title. This dataset contains 21 *.xlsx files in which each file name belongs to the figure's subplots. 

Figure 1b > Collection efficiency & Purcell factor vs. Wavelength

Figure 2a > Purcell factor vs. Wavelength vs. Central disk diameter
Figure 2b > Purcell factor vs. Wavelength vs. Duty cycle
Figure 2c > Collection efficiency vs. Wavelength vs. Central disk diameter
Figure 2d > Collection efficiency vs. Wavelength vs. Duty cycle

Figure 3a > Collection efficiency & Purcell factor vs. polar angle (1nm above and middle of the disk)
Figure 3b > Purcell factor vs. X & Y displacement
Figure 3c > Collection efficiency vs. X & Y displacement
Figure 3d > Collection efficiency & Purcell factor vs. Z displacement

Figure 4a > Excitation enhancement vs. Number of rings (532nm and emission wavelength) (1nm above and middle of the disk)
Figure 4b > Radiative decay rate enhancement vs. Number of rings
Figure 4c > Collection efficiency enhancement vs. Number of rings
Figure 4d > Effective enhancement vs. Number of rings (532nm and emission wavelength) (1nm above and middle of the disk)

Figure 5a > Collection efficiency vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (1st ring)
Figure 5b > Purcell factor vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (1st ring)
Figure 5c > Collection efficiency vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (2nd ring)
Figure 5d > Purcell factor vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (2nd ring)
Figure 5e > Collection efficiency vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (2nd ring)
Figure 5e > Purcell factor vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (2nd ring)

Figure 6c > Collection efficiency vs. Number of rings (with and without apodization)
Figure 6d > Purcell factor vs. Number of rings (with and without apodization)

Research results based upon these data are published at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32359-0